Jon Dougherty's The Commoner

Daily rants on the illogic of the political Left.

Wednesday, January 05, 2005

Did the UN scam us for tsunami aid?

© 2005 Jon E. Dougherty
January 4, 2005

Within hours of learning how badly a series of quake-induced tsunamis had ravaged several Asian nations, President Bush was already pledging millions of taxpayer dollars for aid and assistance, to help the affected nations recover.

Indeed, this most generous of administrations has pledged and spent more than $100 billion since 9/11 to liberate millions of people, provide them with a fresh start, and help them recover from any number of horrors, hazards and disasters and dictators.

This is a familiar story. Throughout the years the United States, as we became the most economically successful country in the history of the world, has also become one of the most generous. Each and every year the American people and our government provide billions of dollars in aid and assistance to countries far less fortunate than our own. Granted, sometimes that aid is tied to the advancement of our own interests, but all things considered and generally speaking, we get very little in return for our charitable investments.

In many cases, we are often held in contempt despite our generosity. Enter the United Nations.

This is an organization that allows criminal rogue nations an equal say in world events, then criticizes democracies for their behavior. It is an organization that has bungled so many international operations on its own it has developed a reputation for being impotent. And under the "leadership" of its latest chief, Kofi Annan, tens of billions of dollars were "allegedly" pillaged by a madman via the UN's phony "oil-for-food" program to buy enough cover to get away with it. One of those bought off reportedly includes Annan's own son.

The primary funding mechanism for all of this has been the American people. Besides being the UN's largest financial contributor (every dollar the UN contributes to tsunami aid is funded in part by Americans), the United States has, throughout the decades, provided hundreds of billions of dollars in "extra" assistance, including military aid, when the impotent and hapless UN leadership gets itself into a bind.

The long and short of it is this: America and Americans have always stood for freedom, liberty, justice and generosity. The UN claims to have these qualities but the reality couldn't be further from the claim.

With this in mind, how is it that some self-important UN bureaucrat feels it is justified to describe U.S. generosity in terms of tsunami relief "stingy?"

UN Undersecretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs Jan Egeland said just that Dec. 27, shortly after Bush stepped up and became one of the first major Western nations to pledge any sort of aid, financial or otherwise.

"It is beyond me why are we so stingy, really," he told reporters. "There are several donors who are less generous than before in a growing world economy," he said, adding that politicians in the United States and Europe "believe that they are really burdening the taxpayers too much, and the taxpayers want to give less. It's not true. They want to give more."

Let's get real. The U.S. is stingy like the UN is efficient and relevant.

But doesn't Egeland know this? Yes. Does he also know such a comment would not only anger Americans but act as sort of a challenge to us as well? Could be.

Within 24 hours of Egeland's comment, Bush upped the dollar amount of U.S. assistance. Within the first few days, he cobbled together a coalition of nations including Japan, Australia and India to form an international aid group designed to provide tsunami assistance. And within a week he "donated" the use of an entire U.S. Navy aircraft carrier battle group, complete with thousands of Marines to help distribute more aid and provide on-the-ground rescue assistance.

Total bill: Something closer to $1 billion, say some analysts. After all, moving around aircraft carrier battle groups isn't cheap.

In the end, it wouldn't surprise me to learn Egeland's comments were just another well-orchestrated UN scam, aimed at shaming the world's most generous and free nation into contributing much more than our fair share of assistance. Odd, isn't it, that Egeland only chastised the West, and not the oil-rich monarchies and sheikdoms of the Muslim world, or communist China, with its double-digit annual economic growth rate, or the African Union, which could draw from any number of fiscally solvent nations.

Liberals have argued that great responsibility and demand is often placed on the greatest powers. Maybe, but to that end a question must be asked: When is enough enough?

"For anyone confused about why the rest of the world might infer America is stingy, don't think of the enormity of U.S. aid as $35 million -- think of it as the wealthiest country on earth giving 65 percent of one baseball player's salary over four years (Pedro Martinez) to help mitigate the worst disaster in recorded world history," wrote one reader in a "Letter to the Editor" of the Boston Globe this week.

This mentality not only ignores the true "enormity of U.S. aid," it also undermines the selfless generosity demonstrated by generations of Americans throughout history. Seriously: What other nation can claim its government and its people are more generous than we?

And while all of this giving never ceases to amaze me, I still can't help but think we were duped into giving much more than even we were obliged to give, while other, equally able, nations have once again been given a pass by the UN.

Sometimes you just can't please people, no matter what you do for them. Before it criticizes us again, the world should consider how much worse off it would be if America stopped letting itself be talked into always being the world's sugar daddy.

Jon E. Dougherty is author of "Illegals: The Imminent Threat Posed by Our Unsecured U.S.-Mexico Border," and a correspondent for NewsMax.com.

4 Comments:

At August 20, 2005 at 11:45 AM, Blogger alexandrea726otis said...

='Brand New News From The Timber Industry!!'=

========Latest Profile==========
Energy & Asset Technology, Inc. (EGTY)
Current Price $0.15
================================

Recognize this undiscovered gem which is poised to jump!!

Please read the following Announcement in its Entierty and
Consider the Possibilities
Watch this One to Trade!

Because, EGTY has secured the global rights to market
genetically enhanced fast growing, hard-wood trees!

EGTY trading volume is beginning to surge with landslide Announcement.
The value of this Stock appears poised for growth! This one will not
remain on the ground floor for long.

Keep Reading!!!!

===============
"BREAKING NEWS"
===============

-Energy and Asset Technology, Inc. (EGTY) owns a global license to market
the genetically enhanced Global Cedar growth trees, with plans to
REVOLUTIONIZE the forest-timber industry.

These newly enhanced Global Cedar trees require only 9-12 years of growth before they can
be harvested for lumber, whereas worldwide growth time for lumber is 30-50 years.

Other than growing at an astonishing rate, the Global Cedar has a number of other benefits.
Its natural elements make it resistant to termites, and the lack of oils and sap found in the wood
make it resistant to forest fire, ensuring higher returns on investments.

the wood is very lightweight and strong, lighter than Poplar and over twice
as strong as Balsa, which makes it great for construction. It also has
the unique ability to regrow itself from the stump, minimizing the land and
time to replant and develop new root systems.

Based on current resources and agreements, EGTY projects revenues of $140 Million
with an approximate profit margin of 40% for each 9-year cycle. With anticipated
growth, EGTY is expected to challenge Deltic Timber Corp. during its initial 9-year cycle.

Deltic Timber Corp. currently trades at over $38.00 a share with about $153 Million in revenues.
As the reputation and demand for the Global Cedar tree continues to grow around the world
EGTY believes additional multi-million dollar agreements will be forthcoming. The Global Cedar nursery has produced
about 100,000 infant plants and is developing a production growth target of 250,000 infant plants per month.

Energy and Asset Technology is currently in negotiations with land and business owners in New Zealand,
Greece and Malaysia regarding the purchase of their popular and profitable fast growing infant tree plants.
Inquiries from the governments of Brazil and Ecuador are also being evaluated.

Conclusion:

The examples above show the Awesome, Earning Potential of little
known Companies That Explode onto Investor�s Radar Screens.
This stock will not be a Secret for long. Then You May Feel the Desire to Act Right
Now! And Please Watch This One Trade!!


GO EGTY!


All statements made are our express opinion only and should be treated as such.
We may own, take position and sell any securities mentioned at any time. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect
to predictions, goals, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are
not statements of historical fact and may be "forward, looking
statements." forward, looking statements are based on expectations, estimates
and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results
or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. This newsletter was paid $3,000 from third party (IR Marketing).
Forward,|ooking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as: "projects", "foresee", "expects". in compliance with Se'ction 17. {b), we disclose the holding of EGTY shares prior to the publication of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest resulting from such holdings due to our intent to profit from the liquidation of these shares. Shares may be sold at any time, even after positive statements have been made regarding the above company. Since we own shares, there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward,looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties that could cause results to
differ materially from those set forth in the forward- looking statements. This is not solicitation to buy or sell stocks, this text is
or informational purpose only and you should seek professional advice from registered financial advisor before you do anything related with buying or selling stocks, penny stocks are very high risk and you can lose your entire investment.

 
At December 31, 2005 at 5:42 AM, Blogger lucyericks8196 said...

I read over your blog, and i found it inquisitive, you may find My Blog interesting. My blog is just about my day to day life, as a park ranger. So please Click Here To Read My Blog

 
At January 21, 2006 at 5:05 PM, Blogger philgonzo0806 said...

I read over your blog, and i found it inquisitive, you may find My Blog interesting. So please Click Here To Read My Blog

http://pennystockinvestment.blogspot.com

 
At May 6, 2006 at 1:41 AM, Blogger johneysmith12901409 said...

Get any Desired College Degree, In less then 2 weeks.

Call this number now 24 hours a day 7 days a week (413) 208-3069

Get these Degrees NOW!!!

"BA", "BSc", "MA", "MSc", "MBA", "PHD",

Get everything within 2 weeks.
100% verifiable, this is a real deal

Act now you owe it to your future.

(413) 208-3069 call now 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home